Sounds good; thanks Carlos. Fred
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 10:41 AM To: Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]> Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11 Hi Fred, We’ll add the ref in the next revision. Thanks for the feedback. Carlos On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 19:09, Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Carlos, I think it would be worth considering this model both on its own merits and/or in conjunction with the dmm document. The notion of a “home network” need not be preserved, and instead we have scalable de-aggregation. Please have a look (as I did for the dmm doc) and post comments or questions. I think this is already considered in the " Mobility case, anchor relocation" in the draft. We can add additional references as examples of this, but I'd prefer not to add more text, as we are trying to keep the document short and what you have described is covered IMHO with the current text. >> Scalable de-aggregation (and the routing system required to route it ) is >> not covered in >> ‘draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring’; it is covered in >> ‘draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp’ >> (a wg item of the RTGWG) and ‘draft-templin-intarea-6706bis’ from which the >> RTGWG >> doc was derived. Please add references and supporting text. >> >> Thanks - Fred -- Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any brevity or typing errors.
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
