Hi Jie,

In-line ..

--
Uma C.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:22 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Chairs,
>
>
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
>
>
> After reading this document and the discussion on the list, I also think
> some alignment with the TEAS working group on the definition, terminology
> and framework of network slice would be helpful.
>
[Uma]: I supported and gave my suggestions on the TEAS WG definitions draft
(where the adoption call for the same ended 2 days ago there). Though there
were few opinions, it seems 'IETF Network Slice' terminology may not be
changed as a lot of debate happened on that name and it was also being
chosen to differentiate  the scope from other SDOs (working on various
aspects of slicing in general). In any case, as mentioned earlier wherever
applicable we will use the terminology (of course, agreeable to this WG).


> As for the technical aspects, to my understanding this document proposes a
> mechanism to provide the transport path information to the mobile network
> endpoints, which IMO may also be used in networks without network slicing.
>
[Uma]: I am not sure why you get that understanding. Could you please
elaborate on what caused you to prompt that understanding. AFAIS, that is
not the case. Thx!

> If this understanding is correct, I’d suggest to clarify the relationship
> between the proposed mechanism and the network slicing use case.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jie
>
>
>
> *From:* dmm [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:43 AM
> *To:* dmm <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of
> draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document
>
>
>
> Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review the
> feedback.
>
>
>
> -          Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM
> *To: *dmm <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of
> draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document
>
>
>
> Gentle reminder.
>
>
>
> This adoption call with expire on 18th Jan. Please provide your feedback.
>
>
>
> Just to structure the discussion, we want to understand a.) if the WG
> agrees with the problem statement and is relevant for mobility working
> group, b.) is the proposed solution/approach is a reasonable approach, and
> if it is a good starting point
>
>
>
> On the comments on where this work needs to happen etc , feedback is
> welcome but I would not worry too much about that now. Let’s agree upon the
> problem statement first and focus more on the technical aspects. If this is
> a valid problem, we can always decide to do that work here, or in some
> other group and that’s based on AD/Chair inputs and  on the review
> expertise that is needed for this work completion.
>
>
>
> -Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
> *To: *dmm <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *[DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08
> as a WG document
>
>
>
> Folks:
>
>
>
> The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have
> presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG
> meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the mailers and
> there is some level of interest for the work from the community. We are
> therefore considering the adoption of this document as a DMM WG document,
> to be moved on Informational Standards track.
>
>
>
> *Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G*
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08
>
>
>
>
>
> With this background, we would like to ask the WG to provide some feedback
> on their interest for this work. Please provide substantial comments as why
> this SHOULD be adopted, or why it SHOULD NOT be adopted. If there is
> interest, and if there are no other concerns from AD/IESG/Others, then we
> may take up this work.
>
>
>
> The adoption call will end on 18th of January, 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> DMM WG Chairs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to