HI Again: One quick comment in line:
Cheers Dave From: Uma Chunduri <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 4:52 PM To: David Allan I <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13 Dear Dave, I got what you are saying. >The sorts of features we are seeing in the larger 3GPP picture AFAIK are more >recent additions for URLLC, CIoT etc. >So picking and choosing based on convenience is not an option; the problem >space is not a matter of choosing what to support, >but in replicating the functionality exists and having similar extensibility. In this particular case, I am afraid we can even take that kind of undertaking to create a complete "Stunt Double" as you put it. I also believe this is not under the purview of IETF and inevitably we intervene with their control plane procedures to create this kind of framework. I still believe we ought to develop value addition functionalities in the transport network layer, applicable to these deployments which brings a better E2E service. At the end of the day neither a packet traversing the network doesn't know which SDO owns this nor the end user consuming the service. DA> I’d consider the “stunt double” capability in the user plane to be table stakes, the “value add” beyond that point is the “justify your existence” moment 😊 This is a generic comment and I am not implying to any particular work being done here. BR! -- Uma C.
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
