Hi Murray, Many thanks for your review. See inline with [PC]. I've posted an updated rev of the draft (-24).
Cheers, Pablo. -----Original Message----- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[email protected]> Sent: sábado, 31 de diciembre de 2022 5:48 To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The shepherd writeup avoids the question about current or planned implementations, and the simple answer "Yes" to #17 seems to be not as informative as we'd like. [PC] Please see the Appendix A of the document (Implementations). Section 11 is missing the "Change controller" column for all values. I can't tell why that column is present in the registry, actually, since it wasn't present in RFC 8986 which created it, so it seems like there's something to be cleaned up here with IANA. [PC] I've added the Change Controller column (obviously with value= IETF). _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
