On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:09:55 -0700 Go Linux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4/7/15, Nuno Magalhães <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [Dng] dev-list > To: "dng" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015, 2:19 PM > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Martijn Dekkers > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know this has come up a few times in the past, but I would really > > like to see a dev specific list, with some strict "dev-only" rules. > > I disagree, this will mean the devs will self-segregate and tend to > ignore users. > Having "both camps" in the same list evens each other out. > > -------------------------------------------- > > Good point. But I thought the reason for the suggestion was because > of the amount of fairly useless chatter on this list that the devs > have to wade through. (Honestly, it annoys me too.) If there is a > -dev list, I would sign up to see what's happening but it's unlikely > I would participate because I'm not really qualified to do so. > > golinux I agree with nuno in that segregating leads to disconnect. Like that which we saw recently in the Debian community. I agree with golinux that there's been too much chatter with too much heat. I'll try very hard to keep my responses to hot topics and/or settled law offlist, and if necessary, simply filter to /dev/null those who repeatedly tempt me to negatively impact the list. And I'm sorry for the part I played in the recent hot topic, and will redouble my efforts to stay out of stuff like that. SteveT Steve Litt Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting http://www.troubleshooters.com/28 _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
