On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 12:06 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > Here are two more reasons for Devuan:
I'd just say more signs that systemd was pushed into production way early and not new objections to the (widely held to be defective in the opinion here) design principles themselves. The failure to give a descriptive failure message when dropping into emergency mode is the only real unforgivable sin and it is not something the Pottering Cabal will object to fixing. The addition of nofail to go with noauto is properly documented in the fstab manpage so that isn't a bug, in fact it sounds like a useful addition which should be stolen/adopted. You really don't want a system with an unknown fraction of it's filesystems absent to attempt booting into a fully network connected state. No foul can be rightfully lodged against them on that score; Failing safe is the 'UNIX Way.' If you need to fix a machine which can't boot you need physical console access or an out of band management method such as IPMI.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
