On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:11:12PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2015, 11:16:12 schrieb Jude Nelson: > > Whelp, looks like kdbus in systemd is no longer optional (but to be fair, > > its use can be disabled at runtime, and won't be used anyway if kdbus > > isn't present in the kernel). > > > > Announcement: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/033170.html > > Sorry, missed that as I wrote my post a minute ago. > > It is exactly this attitude and this approach that I feel uneasy about. > Instead of humbly waiting and working towards having kdbus accepted to the > kernel, systemd developers seem to use any means to create pressure to have > it included eventually. >
And you will see that they will have it included in the kernel, as they have had systemd accepted as the default init in any existing GNU/Linux distribution. I still have problems understanding why this is happening, and maybe a caveman like me will never get through it, but this is how things work in this community nowadays. And that's exactly why I have now also problems recognising this as *my* community.... HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
