On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:17:52 +0000 Eugene Bolshakoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Fvwm's good. Resource light, very configurable. That being said, you > > must be *very* knowledgeable to get fvwm to work in a way that's > > conducive to your workstyle, especially if you have poor visual > > acuity like I do. > > I think this is very good to be so configurable, I like this :) Hi Eugene, I know for a fact that you're right about fvwm, because I've seen many people make it into exactly the interface they want, and different fvwm setups look *spectacularly* different from each other. Trouble is, *I* have never been able to configure it into usefulness. I can't be the only one who has trouble configuring fvwm to productively suit my workstyle. I mean, in certain ways I'm kind of smart, so I'd assume other smart people are confused by fvwm. Which means maybe you and I should write an fvwm configuration document. We would be the ideal team, because I can't get to first base with fvwm (I've tried for many years), and you operate fvwm like it's a puppet on a string. Documenting this thing would be as simple as my asking you questions, you answering them, and one of us writing that stuff down. SteveT Steve Litt June 2015 featured book: The Key to Everyday Excellence http://www.troubleshooters.com/key _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
