Доброго времени суток, Gregory.
Спасибо за ответ, Sat, 4 Jul 2015 15:50:54 -0700, вы писали: > I did actually, but in another thread which you might have missed. Probably. Then, excuse me for the noise. But you may know how it happens: you just see something that you would help with. -- Then you have ether to reply or to walk by. -- Going to look for whole the thread -- is extra task. So it remains to answer or walk by. -- I choose the first. -- Still i think it is better to answer not given question than walk by -- as the interested side (thread/question author) will accept the answer or reject it -- depending on what he/she already said. -- So it can be of worth to her/him. > Yes, the gnome-orca package description seems to be quite > over-simplified. Try this: > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orca_(assistive_technology)> > > I think the introduction there does a better job than the package Oh, i see now. Here nothing to say for me -- i stand far from such software, and it seems your choice is little for now. But, may, if you're much concerned of the software -- to try compile yourself the binaries -- the goal is to reduce components of GNOME -- and so your dependency of whole project? -- May, there are a lot of technologies (libraries) are used that you can easily get rid of? -- Just food for thinking. С уважением, Ста. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
