Good evening, 2015-12-26 4:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:50:48 +0100 > Teodoro Santoni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey there, >> >> 2015-12-25 18:42 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt <[email protected]>: >> > Anyway, if I stick in a thumb drive that contains >> > partitions /dev/sdd1 and /dev/sdd2, would the most convenient way >> > for it to automount be /mnt/sdd1 and /mnt/sdd2, or would it be more >> > convenient by the ID so it might look >> > like /mnt/usb-Generic_Flash_Disk_0FEAEC2F-0:0-part1 >> > and /mnt/usb-Generic_Flash_Disk_0FEAEC2F-0:0-part2? >> >> My very personal use-case suggests this behaviour: if the device has a >> label, use that (/mnt/label), otherwise the block device name for >> brevity. > > That *does* sound good. I might put it on a todo list. But what also > has to be checked for is that two plugged in devices don't > inadvertently have the same label.
On label overlap, I would fallback to the device name. Merry Whatever (and have a nice day if you're atheist)! _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
