Edward Bartolo <[email protected]> writes: > This is enough evidence to be very vigilant where an OS uses systemd. > Breaking hardware is a very serious issue, will not fix is not acceptable > as a responsible reply.
In all seriousness, what is the guy supposed to do if some less-than-informed person accidentally deletes something he'd better have kept and then goes into "scream bloody murder" mode because the system actually gave him enough rope to hang himself? Beyond coming out of this with a re-inforced impression that - as soon as his software allows users to do antyhing - they will (intentionally or stupidly) cause as much mayhem as possible and then publically blame him for that, that is. If this isn't documented (which I don't know), one could call it a booby trap. If there's not way easy to prevent the mounted filesystem from being deleted, eg, by umounting it or protecting it in some other way, not by 'remembering' that one must manually steer around it, there'd be something seriously amiss with the software. If it's documented and could have been protected, PEBKAC. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
