The proposed fix is to mark it in fstab as read only... I was under the impression fstab was one of the things systemd wanted to replace/eradicate?
2016-02-02 16:15 GMT+01:00 Fernando M. Maresca <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:07:17AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > Back in the BIOS/MBR days, we had a very thin, very tiny interface to > > the pre-boot stuff. About the only way you could mess it up was to blow > > a bios upgrade, so you were always *very* careful during that process. > > But in every other respect with BIOS/MBR, nothing you could do in > > software could damage your hardware. > > > > BIOS/MBR had a very thin interface. > > > > Now comes UEFI, with this huge interface, to its pre-boot firmware and > > non-volatile RAM, intended to be accessed by run of the mill > > application programs and even commands typed in at the command prompt. > > How is this exposure of many different "EFI variables" to every > > possible software on the system different from systemd's spaghetti web > > of dependencies? > > > > Answer: It's not. It's one more case of abdication of modularity. > > +1 > > -- > Fernando M. Maresca > - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Cel: 221 15 545 8196 > Tel: 221 450 5378 > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
