"T.J. Duchene" <[email protected]> writes: > On 2016-03-01 20:22, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> "T.J. Duchene" <tj@???> writes: >> > On 03/01/2016 08:15 AM, dng-request@??? wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> > I'd just like to offer my opinions on the subject of Debian/Devuan >> > libraries, linking and so on. This is just an opinion, so no one has >> > to agree by any stretch of the human imagination, nor do I feel it >> > necessary to defend it. >> >> It's not "just an opinion", it asserts quite a few things which are at >> least worded in a very scarily sounding and vague way, if not outright >> wrong. > > I am sorry you took it that way. I was just keeping it "simple" as I > said. =)
And I disgree with your assessment of this being "a simplified" description, instead of a fairly complicated and seriously deceptive one. >> As single example: Applications aren't "compiled with" dynamic >> libraries, they're combined with them at runtime which happens in the >> same way regardless of the system they were compiled on. > > I am not trying to be rude or condescending, but if you prefer a more > qualified answer to show that I know what I am talking about, then I > must disagree with you. They are not "combined" with anything except > a set of calls, Oh, they are. Try running pmap -d $$ in a shell to see this. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
