"T.J. Duchene" <[email protected]> writes: > On 2016-03-01 23:41, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> "T.J. Duchene" <tj@???> writes: >> > On 2016-03-01 20:22, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> >> "T.J. Duchene" <tj@???> writes: >> >> > On 03/01/2016 08:15 AM, dng-request@??? wrote: >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> >> >> > I'd just like to offer my opinions on the subject of Debian/Devuan >> >> > libraries, linking and so on. This is just an opinion, so no one has >> >> > to agree by any stretch of the human imagination, nor do I feel it >> >> > necessary to defend it. >> >> >> >> It's not "just an opinion", it asserts quite a few things which are at >> >> least worded in a very scarily sounding and vague way, if not outright >> >> wrong. >> > >> > I am sorry you took it that way. I was just keeping it "simple" as I >> > said. =) >> >> And I disgree with your assessment of this being "a simplified" >> description, instead of a fairly complicated and seriously deceptive >> one. > > I've mentioned that it was possible to support multiple versions of > the same library. The exact mechanics of why or how do not matter in > saying so on this list. I see no reason to stray further from that.
If this text was supposed to have a relation to anything I wrote in the two e-mails on this, it certainly escapes me completely. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
