On 13/03/16 09:28, KatolaZ wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:54:19PM +0100, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > > > [cut] > >>> >>> I haven't said I gave up on the rpi0/1 port of Devuan. I have said >>> that it would be difficult to maintain it, if we ever get to put it in >>> place. >> >> I might miss the whole point of this discussion, but I have a RPi 1 A + fvwm >> + devuan running without any problem. But it started with the "official" >> wheezy raspbian image ... >> > > Now I am the one who has missed the whole point then, since the armhf > packages of Devuan should not run on the arm6 you have on the rpi1. > that's incorrect, armhf is arm7 abi with vector floating point support.
rpi1 and rpi0 both use the same chip which is armv6 abi but with a floating point unit armel is armv6 with out the floating point support. > I tried myself with the rpi0 (see the initial thread, a few weeks > ago), dist-upgraded a raspbian to Devuan Jessie and got plenty of > SIGILL (Illegal instruction), which made the system unusable after the > dist-upgrade. I tried the procedure twice, with identical results. > Yup, it would have worked with armel though but slow for the devuan pacakges. > To the best of my knowledge, the rpi0 should be identical to the rpi1, > except from the form factor, so there should be something wrong > somewhere, but I can't see neither what nor where it is.... > yup. -- Daniel Reurich Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd. 021 797 722
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
