On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: [cut]
> > good to have a pivuan for armv6 + FP2 for rpi0, but it is true that > > with the new rpi3 it would be far better and easier to invest time in > > a pivuan for armhf, which is what aitor is rightfully doing. The > > packages are already there, and there is no need to support another > > port... > > ..this means Devuan is _not_ the answer for the millions of > armv6+FP2/rpi0/1 users out there. > Pity, we could have used them here. > I haven't said I gave up on the rpi0/1 port of Devuan. I have said that it would be difficult to maintain it, if we ever get to put it in place. HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
