On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:05:20AM +0000, hellekin wrote: > > Joey Hess in his departing email mentioned that The Debian Constitution > "is a toxic document" [0], although he didn't say why exactly (and > didn't reply to my inquiry about it so far, which I can understand.) > > Nevertheless, I think that if the part saying "users before all" was > actually followed, Devuan probably would not exist now. > > I'm very much concerned that our own Devuan Constitution inherit the > "toxicity" that Joey Hess interpreted in the Debian Constitution, and > that's why I drafted one that departs from Debian's (although I cannot > be certain of its lack of toxicity.)
Can we get Joey Hess to review it? -- hendrik Nevertheless, the discussion so > far was avoided, which is not to say we should have it now. As the > Shadoks say: "if there's a problem, there's a solution. If there's no > solution, then there's no problem." > > Cheers, > > == > hk > > [0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/11/msg00174.html > > -- > _ _ We are free to share code and we code to share freedom > (_X_)yne Foundation, Free Culture Foundry * https://www.dyne.org/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
