Quoting Alessandro Selli <alessandrose...@linux.com>:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 at 22:03:47 +0000 Arnt Gulbrandsen <a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:Alessandro Selli writes:This still doesn't explain why they decided to force-feed Google's DNS server on the user without prompting the poor fellow any possible choice."Your network sucks. Do you want to [ ] use google or [ ] just give up?""Your network stinks. What DNS servers do you want to use? [...] [ ] Pick random ones [ ] Pick the geographically closest ones [ ] No DNS configuration now Given there is choice, why artificially limit people's possibility to choose how to skrew their networking up they way they enjoy it most? :-) BTW, I'd set FoolDNS as the default choice! ;-)
I counter that these three (or at least "no config now") should be on top of the list.
-- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
binBnIikqa_TH.bin
Description: PGP Public Key
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
