On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:18:10PM +0100, Alessandro Selli wrote: [cut]
> > I am strongly convinced that we don't want to (and we should not, by > > any means) be responsible for DNS configuration, mainly because we > > don't want to have users complaining because they "..have set up the > > fallback DNS during Devuan installation, but then it got removed when > > I restarted my laptop...". > > > > No automatism should take care of policy. No automatism can cure > > ignorance. > > This is precisely the reason we're giving the user a chance to perform their > choice of DNS setting, unlike what they decided to do at Debian (silently > configure Goggle DNS servers as a fallback with no possible user interaction). > I thought we were talking about a DNS fallback at *install* time. If this is about managing DNS serverd *after* installation, this is probably something we should not care about at all, IMHO. It's the user's responsibility to set their networking, not ours... My2Cents KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
