Quoting Arnt Karlsen (a...@iaksess.no): > ..make it GPLv2, v3 is too kind on violators. ;o)
Steve leans strongly towards permissive licensing, of the MIT-ish flavour. Copyright violation is actually possible under permissive licences, too: The obvious way is to wrongfully remove another contributor's copyright notice from incumbent source code -- as a judge found AT&T Bell Labs to have done in his preliminary ruling in the AT&T v. UC Regents lawsuit (the BSD lawsuit), just before the case was quietly settled. But they're rare, because you have to be kind of a colossal idiot to violate them. -- Cheers, Homo in Domu Alba, qui est iratus et habet in Rick Moen artificialibus capillum: Quod homo non sit r...@linuxmafia.com honesta, et est perniciosa in rei publicae. McQ! (4x80) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
