On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:08:47PM +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
[cut] > > > >In prior discussions in this space concerning libsystemd0, there was a > >futile confrontation between people who (correctly) pointed out that it > >does nothing if systemd isn't present, and others who (correctly) > >pointed out that it could be revised to do undesirable things. What > >better way to deal with the latter alleged threat than to maintain a > >separate libsystemd0 fork (package) managed so it never does anything > >other than answer the published library calls and state that systemd > >isn't present? > > > >If you-plural object that much to libsystemd0 because future revisions > >_could_ do bad things, create a substitute. > Expanding to that we can even make a libsystemd0 that actually works with > any init system (except systemd) for all relevant init parts and to all > other calls answering that systemd is not present. > > I fail to see the importance of such task, since I really don't understand what are these things that all init systems have in common, except for riping orphaned processes. But again, if you feel like having a library for all init systems to share is something worth doing, please do it. My2Cents KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
