El 22/08/17 a les 02:48, Alessandro Selli ha escrit: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 at 10:32:43 +0200 > Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net> wrote: > > [...] > >> This logic does not guarantee 100% predictable naming (think about >> removable NICs), but gives enough confort to a sysadmin deals any with >> situation. > > If it's not 100% predictable and configurable by the sysadmin then it does > *not* provide "enough confort", as in an Enterprise environment this means > 100% certainty that the system comes up with each networking card having > a definite, assigned name and that everything that depends on networking is > always going to work fine short of a hardware failure. > Randomness is very unwelcome in critical systems and in data centers, where > even a tiny percentage of random malfunction has to be multiplied by the > numer of racks and devices that are present to be deemed acceptable. > > > Alessandro
Please, differenciate between predictable name and definitive name. persistent-net.rules allows 100% definitive names. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
