On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 01:51 -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:42:51 -0500 > "Ismael L. Donis Garcia" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But I understand that the new versions of openrc already bring the > > possibility of functioning as an init system independently. > > > > In that case, openrc could not be used as an alternative init? > > Yes. > > However, an alternative init wasn't the subject of this thread: It > started as getting libreswan to run even though Debian doesn't > provide a sysvinit init script, and then addition of a Process > Supervisor to sysvinit was suggested (by me) as a possible solution. > > Later, somebody renamed this thread to "openrc init", which discusses > openrc as an alternative init.
That somebody was me. Hi Steve I have a name. And if discussing openrc as an init you should have replied to my mail, not the previous one. And openrc-init is not a supervisor, has never claimed to be either. In my opinion you are pushing too hard for your runit, s6 etc scrpits. Just show us the code please. That talks much more than words ;) Just for clarity: This changed thread subject is _not_ about libreswan or or supervisors. You can continue with that in the origilan thread. But honestly, that thread is not even about supervisors. Maybe you should start your own thread? _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
