On Friday 12 January 2018 at 18:23:19, Steve Litt wrote:
> Just speaking for myself, because of its deliberate obfuscations making
> integration extremely difficult, I don't consider SystemD to be free
> software.
So what do you classify it as?
Proprietary? Closed source? Commercial?
What label works best for you?
> [1]: This point is credible only if one believes the primary motivation
> for maintaining systemd is the obfuscation of Linux to make money
> with Linux training and consultation. I have that belief.
Interesting. I don't agree, but it's an interesting theory.
Antony.
--
"The future is already here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
- William Gibson
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
