Quoting Alessandro Selli ([email protected]): > The ignorant peasant regularly claims the words of the savant to be > "obscure geekery".
That's me, ignorant peasant and dumb ox. You may have heard the saying: You can always tell a Scandinavian, but you can't tell him much. Anyway, I _did_ enjoy the learned and eye-poppingly intricate recounting of all the manifold, wondrous ways PS and PDF are not fully feature-identical, even if that was gloriously irrelevant to the concerns of the antecedent thread. (This is the Internet: Drift happens.) > It's actually focused on your claim that: > > "You can convert a .ps file to .pdf one and back, and not lose any > substantive content in either direction. The primary physical > difference is that the PDF version will be stored compressed, while > the PS version will not." Yes, and I'm aware of the awesome display of edge-case theatre that followed. Now, I'd appreciate being able to chuckle and say thank you. Is that all right with you? > ...factually wrong. ...to edge-case obsessives. Welcome to the chorus. Now, I hope you have other concerns with anyone but me, as I am now bored and want my time back. > Define "furious" No. Sod off, please. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
