On Sat, 19 May 2018 04:25:53 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message
<[email protected]>:
> > {headdesk}
> >
> > I really don't think it's that difficult to understand that avoiding
> > outsourcing in no way precludes appropriate fallbacks and measures
> > to eliminate SPoFs. I'm frankly quite puzzled that my mentioning
> > (as an example) GitLab elicited the comment 'This wouldn't have
> > helped [because] you need redundancy' -- when I nowhere suggested
> > eschewing redundancy and when that open source project has a
> > mountain of documentation on that very subject. And I'm puzzled a
> > second time to see you ignore my having just pointed that out, as
> > if I hadn't.
>
> You need redundancy in repository's admins, not on infrastructure.
..you need both, IME. 17 years ago, I was the final lawful webmaster
at fmb.no, our domain docs were stolen by https://www.frp.no/ people.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
