On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 13:27:03 +0200 KatolaZ <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 12:15:27PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > > [cut] > > > > > Jimmy, please either put up or shut up. > > If there are 'backdoors' in the kernel code, tells us where they > > are, if you cannot or will not, just shut up. > > > > Again, please, let's do our best to keep this discussion > civilised. That's the reason I always ask for facts and references, > because opinions can be easily misintepreted, and can quicly drive a > civilised discussion down to a flame :) I thought I was being civilised, if you want, I could post an uncivilised version ;-) > > It would be great to have at least one link to a place where a kernel > developer discusses a possible backdoor in the Linux kernel. That > would set the bar of the discussion to a more concrete level, IMHO. > I thought that was basically what I asked for, information on these 'backdoors' that Jimmy is so worried about, either that or stop posting about something he cannot backup with proof, or as I said 'put up or shut up' Rowland _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
