On 2018年10月23日 9:10:59 JST, [email protected] wrote: >On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 07:37, Rick Moen <[email protected]> wrote: >> The mainstream choices (disregarding journald) in 2018 are rsyslog >and >> syslog-ng, period. A case could be made for either. I _think_ >> rsyslog remains more common. I've personally only encountered >> syslog-ng in embedded logging appliances manufactured by Hungarian >firm >> Balabit, which also is the primary code maintainer for the open >source >> codebase, offering an enhanced proprietary version to customers. >> Consequently, syslog-ng can be considered a case of 'open core' in >the >> sense that syslog-ng is always at risk of being the disregarded >> stepchild because more effort is put into the proprietary 'Premium >Edition'. >> (This is part of the reason I personally continue to favour rsyslog, >> but not vehemently.) >> >> 2007 comparison: >> >https://web.archive.org/web/20170612021518/http://blog.gerhards.net/2007/08/why-does-world-need-another-syslogd.html > >Even Poettering recommends rsyslog for some use cases > >https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1291 > >--Tom
Hi, by the way, what do u think about what is written on that page regarding logging? http://jdebp.eu./FGA/unix-daemon-design-mistakes-to-avoid.html I was thinking if there is a better way of logging, might be worth to try it. ciao, _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
