On 22/11/18 at 16:28, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 22/11/2018 à 13:42, terryc a écrit : >> IME, absolutely nothing in real life works that way. >> Do you dump all your clothes into one big bin or store them by say >> type? > > Files are stored in different directories, that's it for clean > bookkeeping.
So, you are in favour of retaining a slit / and /usr layout? Good. What does it change if some have /usr mounted on a different device compared to /? > Making these directories mountpoint does not add any sort of ordering. Merging /usr to / does indeed take away ordering. > Only the impression they are more secure. Different mount options do increase the system's overall security *and* they increase flexibility in other areas (like performance and resiliency). > My opinion is that impression is only an impression. Am I allowed to > express my opinion without causing flames? In principle you are, but I do flame when I have to repeat for the 2^64th time reasons to have / split from / while the person I speak to keep ignoring those points and repeating inconsequential matters that either do not apply or are plain wrong. -- Alessandro Selli <[email protected]> VOIP SIP: [email protected] Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key: BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
