Quoting Miles Fidelman (mfidel...@meetinghouse.net): > Speaking as someone who hosts a couple of dozen email lists, I > really don't understand what the fuss is about here.
The fuss involved people having paid no attention to the announcement of Dng's DMARC-mitigation munging starting on December 6th, and so being confused by that and the appended Reply-To. And some people, including you, still aren't getting that, even though it got re-explained yesterday, encore une fois. > If one runs a list, and wants folks on gmail, AOL - any service that > honors p=reject - then one has to: > > 1. adjust headers so that list mail appears to originate from the > list manager, not from the original author Yes. But only where p=reject or p=quarantine.. > 2. publish DKIM & SPF records for the machine hosting the list No, there's no obligation for either of those, to ensure deliverability of mail munged by the MLM software for DMARC-mitigation purposes. > Updating the mailman settings, and publishing the appropriate DNS > records, is really a no brainer for any halfway competent list > administrator. Indeed, the Dng listadmins did exactly that, on Dec. 6th, following instructions I provided. The whole thing was covered here at the time, so I'm puzzled that so many people seem to have failed completely to read the explanations. > The folks who administer lists.dyne.org just need to do it. {headdesk} I'm sorry, but how were the several explanations of this matter, including those just yesterday, unclear? _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng