Quoting Hendrik Boom ([email protected]): > I hope it doesn't add a reply-to header if there's already one.
I can't say for certain, but it's likely GNU Mailman would (in that case) add the poster's real address as an additional address within the existing Reply-To: address (if they even differ). I thus speculate because tat's the heuristic I see modern versions of GNU Mailman follow when the listadmin has enabled conventional (non-DMARC related) Reply-To: munging (the type infamous for triggering Internet flamewars, the munging practice obsoleted by IETF in 2001 via RFCs 2822 and 2369, but still popular on mailing lists catering to technophobes). So, I would expect Mailman's DMARC-mitigation Reply-To: addition to use the same code. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
