On 2020-10-28 07:47, Rick Moen wrote: ... > I continue to like projects that are limited in feature scope enough to > not live or die by corporate underwriting. E.g., mutt continues to be > maintainable by a small group of motivated developers. When I want it > to be graphical, I run it in an xterm. ;-> >
I totally agree. That is one reason I thought TB was a good choice over other, at the time, popular software such as Eudora and Outlook. It was a safe bet, but maybe I should start looking into a new "PIM" infrastructure. I'll keep dovecot and postfix, but I'm not sure about the rest. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
