On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:18:56 +1100 wirelessduck--- via Dng <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 31 Oct 2020, at 10:52, Simon Walter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/30/20 3:19 AM, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote: > >>> That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND > >>> as my local resolver lately. It's pleasant. > >> From what we discovered about unbound during one of the meetings, > >> I clearly do not trust that technology. > > > > What meetings? Is it possible to divulge some more info WRT what > > you discovered? I am curious. > > Could it be related to this? > > https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/303 If that's all it is, it applies only to sysvinit. One can install runit, supervise runit as a case-by-case supervisor from sysvinit's /etc/inittab, and start and stop unbound from runit. I was doing this ten years ago with djbdns. There's no shame in having some of your daemons started by sysvinit, and others started by daemontools, daemontools-encore, runit, or s6. SteveT Steve Litt Autumn 2020 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times http://www.troubleshooters.com/thrive _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
