on an aside, there will be many new labels entering the roots in the next 24 months. Thos applications would be very grateful for a synopsis of your experience.
thanks, -rick On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Rick Wesson <r...@support-intelligence.com> wrote: > +1 > > getting on the mozilla list effects lots of applications. > > -rick > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:55 PM, RijilV <rij...@riji.lv> wrote: >> My experience is many people use Mozilla's public suffix list for allowing >> folks to create resources on their app services. This is because a large >> number of TLDs don't support creating records directly off of them, and the >> 3rd parties don't want to accidentally grant ownership to a higher namespace >> to an individual. For example, .uk is a TLD, but you shouldn't let people >> regirester apps under that because someone could cleverly take co.uk and >> create sub apps within that that they didn't own. >> >> http://publicsuffix.org/list/ >> >> Incidentally, I don't see .cw in that list. It is open to submissions... >> http://publicsuffix.org/submit/ >> >> .r' >> >> >> On 20 January 2013 16:28, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2013-01-21, at 11:55, .CW Registry Curacao <regis...@una.net> wrote: >>> >>> > I am not sure this is an issue that you can do anything about, however >>> > we have been advised by our colleagues from the ccNSO (ICANN) to send you >>> > this email message. >>> > >>> > We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered worldwide. >>> > Several Internet services sites cannot be used by our customers, because >>> > the .CW is not recognized. >>> > In our case it prevents us as university to make use of (for instance) >>> > Google Apps. >>> >>> There are google people on this list who (if they haven't already >>> contacted you about it) will no doubt be happy to help you out with that >>> specific problem, in their normal efficient way. >>> >>> More generally, there are many people who make assumptions about what a >>> valid domain name is. A common example (I find) can be found in web forms >>> which validate e-mail addresses. I can't even remember the number of times I >>> was told that jab...@ca.afilias.info was invalid when I was working for >>> Afilias, which always struck me as pleasantly ironic, especially when the >>> web forms in question were provided by people trying to sell us stuff. >>> >>> There's no central registry for broken human expectations of how the DNS >>> works. You pretty much need to just get used to complaining to the people >>> who provide individual broken services when you find them. >>> >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dns-operations mailing list >>> dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net >>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >>> dns-jobs mailing list >>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-operations mailing list >> dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net >> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >> dns-jobs mailing list >> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs