On Oct 23, 2014, at 11:59 , Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also, as I already noted, modelling this in a delegation-centric zone
> uses the wrong model.  Moreover, the data sets are from a notably tiny
> shared-iterative-resolver community.  It seems to me that
> understanding the endpoint:iterative ratios in (for instance)
> Comcast's, Time-Warner's, AT&T's, Verizon's, and T-Mobile's networks
> (even just in the US) would go a long way to indicating whether the
> inferences about load in this paper are realistic.

Agreed.  Most people are behind caches with at least an order of magnitude more 
users whether they’re at home or at work.  Lots of people are behind caches 
with two or three orders of magnitude more users.  The behaviour of those 
caching recursive servers would be very different from this study.



_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to