On Oct 23, 2014, at 12:28 , Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:47:39PM -0400, > Mark Allman <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 64 lines which said: > >> Short paper / crazy idea for your amusement ... > > The biggest problem I have with this paper is of terminology. I > thought at the beginning that the idea was to get rid of resolvers, > then it appeared you want a resolver, but on the end host, and the, > during the discussion here (your answer to David Conrad), it seems you > want to move the resolver to every application? Reading between the lines, I think the intent was “shared resolver”, or “shared caching resolver”, or possibly just “shared cache.” Whichever way, it seems to be the “shared” part that the paper argues against. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
