Warren Kumari wrote: > ... > > I'd rather see an imperfect solution that anyone can use soon, instead > of hoping that perhaps someone will eventually, maybe solve the issue > sometime in the future.
the delegation NS TTL based solution is not a protocol change; anyone who wants to adopt it can do so immediately. i suggest that clamping at two hours on the upper bound and 30 minutes at the lower bound would give immediate good results even before any registry gets around to changing their delegation TTLs. > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> warren, have you read >> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove/> and do >> you have comments? > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/namedroppers/current/msg09903.html > > and we had a discussion on another mailing list which was eerily > similar to the above. when i was younger i thought that people older than me were mostly crazy. turns out we are mostly forgetful. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
