It appears that Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> said: >> > >> > ai.in am.in ca.in cn.in er.in io.in me.in pg.in tv.in uk.in us.in
>Thanks, that confirms and details their availability as public suffixes. > >These suffixes were specifically provisioned (and are not themselves >delegated, they are included directly in the .in zone) by the .IN ccTLD, >and I am curious whether the intent was specifically to "mirror" >similarly named ccTLDs (and if so, why), or whether perhaps these >2-letter abbreviations have some other significance in India... I'm pretty sure they were opportunistic. They don't appear to match up with Indian states or anything else I can recognize. R's, John _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
