On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:47:33PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote a message of 147 lines which said:
> I am not sure if we need to eventually publish the document as an RFC > however. Whatever the solutions we design, they will take years before they will be fully deployed. Therefore, it is important to document publically the current state of DNS privacy. > It should be a running summary of the design rationale for the > current proposal(s) we are working on, not a rationale for something > we plan to build. Neither the first, not the second. It is supposed to be a description of the current issues / problems with DNS privacy. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
