On Friday, October 17, 2014, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear DPRIVE WG, > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy. > > [ Please note: I am assuming that Stephane and DNSOP are both OK with > us adopting this. It is referenced in our charter, and so might be > adopted by reference, but figured might as well appease the process > gods by doing this officially... Short CfA because it seems > obvious...] > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for > adoption by DPRIVE, > and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends Fri 24-Oct-2014. ... And there is clear consensus for adopting this. Author, please resubmit as -ietf-dprive- Thank you! W > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy, has this IPR been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 > for more details.) > > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
