On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:26:46PM -0900, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote a message of 23 lines which said:
> They introduce delay into the process. The goal of the IETF is not just to produce protocols! Documenting the existing systems, so that people use them properly, is also necessary. > The situations in which problem statement documents are helpful > include those where the working group charter is unacceptably fuzzy > or where there's a lot of contention for "ownership" of solutions. Or simply when there is no actual solution in the short term but it is useful to document that (a good example is section 8 of RFC 6973). > One thing that might minimize the process damage from having one is > agreeing ahead of time that a dprive "problem statement" will *not* > be published as an RFC. Strong disagreement. Today, there is no comprehensive and serious document on the privacy properties/issues of the DNS and, as a result, people either ignore the problem or write nonsense about it. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
