On 05/15/2015 01:35 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > Any DNSvNext protocol MUST work in 100% of network situations where > DNS works or else it has 0% of being adopted.
Dear Phillip, Can I hold you to this statement with respect to this network situation where DNS "works": http://code.kryo.se/iodine/ (This is my favorite example for a DNS application that cannot be supported by the GNU Name System, I didn't consider it important, but clearly you seem to set the bar higher...) Also, how can we ever even know all network situations where "DNS works"? Isn't your bar saying: "do not touch the system in any way ever"? Christian _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
