W dniu 20.10.2015 o 12:27, Stephane Bortzmeyer pisze:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:13:37AM +0200,
> Witold Kręcicki <[email protected]> wrote
> a message of 57 lines which said:
>
>> I wasn't clear enough on that - that example shows records at the
>> delegation point, NSK records are served the same way as DS records in
>> DNSSEC.
>
> This is indeed very ambiguous in the draft. "At the delegation point"
> means nothing. Above or below?
>
I took it word for word from RFC4033, there is a definition there:
Delegation Point: Term used to describe the name at the parental side
of a zone cut. That is, the delegation point for "foo.example"
would be the foo.example node in the "example" zone (as opposed to
the zone apex of the "foo.example" zone). See also zone apex.
that I believe should be either copied or referenced in this draft.
Witold Krecicki
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
