On 29/02/16 21:10, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Is there a difference between what it says ("if the DNS transport is
> not encrypted") and what you said ("in the clear")? Depends on what one means by DNS transport I guess. I don't recall whether the WG had chatted about that. > Would there be a > reason not to change "SHOULD" to "MUST" in the existing text? If e.g. DNS/UDP/IPsec is not an "encrypted DNS transport" then a SHOULD is better. If DNS/UDP/IPsec is considered "encrypted DNS transport" it looks like a MUST is fine, but I've not yet re-read this doc for the telechat, and of course the WG may have had something else in mind. S.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
