Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 16:53, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If you want warn fuzzies then say MUST NOT otherwise it is just > noise. > > You can't enforce it. Do you throw away clear text packets with > the option in the request / response? Adding it won't break anything. > You make testing more difficult by saying MUST NOT. > > I don't intend to change a line of code to support the pad option > in named. I might add it to dig for testing but that is about it. > named will just continue to ignore the option on requests. Well if you ignore it obviously that suits me fine. As the recipient of a lot unwanted port 53 source traffic I'd prefer that the implementation guidance strongly discourage situations where it can be used against me in anger. > > Mark > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
