On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear DPRIVE WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls have indicated that they > believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group > Last Call. > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > This WGLC ends Tue 30-Aug-2016. > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 > for more details.) > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy> Looks good to me. A couple grammatical concerns: Section "3.1. Session Initiation" The last sentance might sound better by adding "therefore" in the middle: "There are significant security issues in mixing protected and unprotected data, therefore UDP connections on a port designated by a given server for DNS-over- DTLS are reserved purely for encrypted communications." Section "4. Performance Considerations" This sentence does not read well to me: "TLS False Start [I-D.ietf-tls-falsestart] which reduces round-trips by allowing the TLS second flight of messages (ChangeCipherSpec) to also contain the (encrypted) DNS query. " -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
