Greetings. I have read the -10 draft, and think it is ready for moving
to the IETF. The authors have done a good job of incorporating comments
from the WG.
Because draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls might be abandoned in favor of RFC
7858 after someone implements it and compares the two, it is appropriate
that this is set to become an Experimental RFC. After testing, if
implementers think that there is value to the DTLS version, it can be
put on Standards Track. It will be interesting to see how that testing
goes when it happens; I'm particularly interested in the tradeoff of
"TCP state is kept in the kernel" vs. "session state is kept in the
application stack" vs. DoS-by-CPU-exhaustion.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
