On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 18 Nov 2016, at 06:13, Shane Kerr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Warren, > > > > At 2016-11-18 13:42:08 +0900 > > Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-mayrhofer-dprive- > padding-profile. > >> > >> The draft is available here: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive- > padding-profile/ > >> > >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for > >> adoption by DPRIVE, > >> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > > > I have read this draft and support its adoption by DPRIVE. > > +1 > > > > >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > > > I am willing to contribute text, and review, and even etc. if necessary. > > +1 > > > > > -------- > > > > Note there was some discussion today in the working group about the > > approach that this document takes. The concern is that this seems to be > > a survey of possible techniques. Personally I think it makes sense to > > have two documents: > > > > 1. A review of all possible approaches (the current document), and > > 2. Recommendations for implementors (based on pending research and > > analysis). > > > > If we really only want one document, then probably it should start with > > recommendations and then include the review of techniques as an > > appendix. > > I happen to favour this second approach of just one document, evolving the > structure of the draft as the recommendations become clearer. > > Sara. > I support and will review. Prefer one doc. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
