> -----Original Message----- > From: Benoit Claise (bclaise) > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:42 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Tim Wicinski <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Eric Vyncke > (evyncke) <[email protected]> > Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: (with > COMMENT) > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Under which conditions do we know that this experiment will be successful?
If there are DNS-over-(D)TLS implementations then the experiment will be successful. Multiple DNS-over-TLS implementations are already available (see https://portal.sinodun.com/wiki/display/TDNS/DNS-over-TLS+implementations). -Tiru > Anything worth nothing? > As an example of a similar RFC, see > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7360#section-1.3 > _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
