> -----Original Message----- > From: Benoit Claise (bclaise) > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:50 PM > To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <[email protected]>; The IESG > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Tim Wicinski <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: > (with COMMENT) > > Hi Tiru, > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Benoit Claise (bclaise) > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:42 AM > >> To: The IESG <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected]; Tim Wicinski > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; Eric Vyncke > >> (evyncke) <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on > >> draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: (with > >> COMMENT) > >> > >> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > >> draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-13: No Objection > >> > >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > >> this introductory paragraph, however.) > >> > >> > >> Please refer to > >> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > >> > >> > >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/ > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> - > >> COMMENT: > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> - > >> > >> Under which conditions do we know that this experiment will be > successful? > > If there are DNS-over-(D)TLS implementations then the experiment will be > successful. Multiple DNS-over-TLS implementations are already available (see > https://portal.sinodun.com/wiki/display/TDNS/DNS-over- > TLS+implementations). > At first glance, that is useful. > Looking through it, I don't see DTLS in there. > So you expect to track the DNS over DTLS implementation progress on that > page, correct?
Yes. > A few words about this would be welcome, along with this URL. > We always try to have static URLs in RFCs. Even if this one is more of a > WIKI, I > personally believe this is fine and useful for an experimental RFC, the goal > being to know how to evaluate when an experiment is successful. Sure, will update draft. -Tiru > > Regards, Benoit > > > > -Tiru > > > >> Anything worth nothing? > >> As an example of a similar RFC, see > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7360#section-1.3 > >> _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
